The Media Co-op

Local Independent News

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

City of St. Catharines Condemns Niagara Escarpment Commission

While masking their own efforts to destroy Escarpment forests

by Dr. John Bacher

Sign identifying Brock University escarpment. Photo: Daniel Nardone
Sign identifying Brock University escarpment. Photo: Daniel Nardone
Brock Research and Innovation Centre on Lockhart Drive. Photo:The Brock News
Brock Research and Innovation Centre on Lockhart Drive. Photo:The Brock News
Lockhart Drive forest line. Photo: Google Maps
Lockhart Drive forest line. Photo: Google Maps

On April 24, 2017, St. Catharines City Council passed a motion condemning the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC) for its not following an “open and transparent” process to change to a protective designation of Niagara escarpment land, six hectares of forest owned by Brock University.  The motion to condemn the NEC as debated at length and passed by a 9 to 3 vote. The dissenting councillors were Bruce Williamson, N. Carlos Garcia, and David Haywood.  

While going along with the motion on the basis that the matter would be more intensively studied in a staff report, councillor Mark Elliott indicated that he wanted to protect the Brock forest since forest cover was dangerously shrinking in the city from the explosion of the Emerald Ash Boer. St. Catharines’ Mayor Walter Sendzik however, based on an Earth Day tour of city parks, maintained that forest health was quite robust.

The City Council  accepted the arguments of Brock  University solicitor Tom Richardson. Specifically, these were that the NEC’s efforts at securing a change of the land’s designation from Escarpment Urban to Escarpment Natural (a more protective designation), represented a “perversion of the planning process.” Brock also attacked the NEC for its “relentless attack” in attempting to protect the forest from development, accusing the Comission of “designation creep.”

The attack on the NEC from St. Catharines followed a unanimous condemnation of the NEC from the Niagara Region’s Planning Economic Development Committee. It, unlike the City Council debate, was not informed by any presentations from the public.

The disputed forest, located along Lockhart Drive, is part of a 130 hectare forested complex identified in the Niagara Region’s Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) report as the Escarpment-Decew Forest. It has been the subject of a 40-year battle between Brock University and environmentalists who seek to protect it.  Originally, Brock sought to have a residential subdivision located here. Now its interested is in the establishment of a “Research Park.”

The Brock Escarpment-Decew Forest  is the largest remaining woodland in the City of St. Catharines. According to the ESA study, it contains a number of rare species, including Bitternut Hickory, Pignut Hickory, the endangered Butternut and Pawpaw. The forest  provides habitat for the regionally rare Great Horned Owl. It is important as part of the forested buffer of the adjacent Short Hills Provincial Park. This wildlife sanctuary is seeing excessive deer numbers in part because of the isolated nature of its forested habitat.

Many dedicated environmentalists have worked to protect the Lockhart Drive Forest during the long 40-year struggle to rescue it, from what originally was a housing subdivision proposal. Of these, the most famous was the prominent Canadian author and former director of the Canadian Wildlife Service, Dr. Frank Banfield. He found that half of the disputed site is an old growth forest.

During the intense debate in St. Catharines City Council this week, the Planning Director, James N Riddell was asked if St. Catharines had other recent planning disputes with the NEC. In this regards, he answered negatively, but with the qualification that he would have to check this assertion.

Regarding recent NEC conflicts with the City of St. Catharines, the Planning Director of  St. Catharines could have been better informed had he been a reader of the Media Co-op. Were he, he would have learned of an important decision whereby the NEC rescued from the threat of development another major St. Catharines forest, located on Glendale Avenue, on January 26, 2017. The NEC rejected an attempt to remove Escarpment Natural Designation on a 17 hectare forest, owned by Kaneff developments.

The NEC report also reveals how the Escarpment Planning staff clashed with that of St. Catharines over the Kaneff development proposal. It reveals how in this matter, the city’s planners “requested an urban designation for the subject lands.” At the same time it called for the end of the Greenbelt’s decade long freeze on urban boundaries, which if actually implemented by the province would essentially liquidate the Greenbelt as a meaningful land use planning tool. 

Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.
Topics: Ideas

Creative Commons license icon Creative Commons license icon

About the poster

Trusted by 2 other users.
Has posted 14 times.
View John Bacher's profile »

Recent Posts:

picture of John Bacher

John Bacher (John Bacher)
St. Catharines
Member since July 2016



660 words

Join the media co-op today
Things the Media Co-op does: Support
Things the Media Co-op does: Report
Things the Media Co-op does: Network
Things the Media Co-op does: Educate
Things the Media Co-op does: Discover
Things the Media Co-op does: Cooperate
Things the Media Co-op does: Build
Things the Media Co-op does: Amplify

User login

Subscribe to the Dominion $25/year

The Media Co-op's flagship publication features in-depth reporting, original art, and the best grassroots news from across Canada and beyond. Sign up now!