Dr. Palmater is an associate professor and the chair of Indigenous Governance in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at Ryerson University.  She has been practicing law for 14 years and holds a doctorate degree in the Science of Law (JSD) in Aboriginal law from Dalhousie University Law School. She is a Mi’kmaw citizen from the Eel River Bar First Nation.

 

Following the event, the Leveller’s Crystel Hajjar sat down with Dr. Palmater to reflect on Indigenous issues in Canada. The following is an edited version of that interview. 

 

 

Probably when I was about six years old. I have eight sisters and three brothers and they are very politically active, and my father demanded that we be active in our community. So they took me to every meeting, protest, negotiation, organization, assembly, and conference. I was small so I didn’t have a choice then. When I was around 12, I started getting involved in Indigenous youth organizations and volunteering at a whole host of them that dealt with housing and chopped-down services. I’ve always been working on the political scene too  – behind the scenes. I’ve never in my memory not been part of it.

 

 

The Indian Act is a complete piece of racist, discriminatory, paternalistic, colonial legislation, which also protects certain rights, legislates funding authorities, and anchors the crown to treaty obligations. It protects treaty rights from interference by provincial laws. There are a whole lot of other things in the Indian Act in addition to the paternalism. So yes, it is a relic, but you cannot just get rid of it. That would mean getting rid our rights and existing protections for our communities.  There are First Nations who want to keep certain parts of the Indian Act to keep the federal government honest.

 

It is up to First Nations when and if they want to get rid of it, and how and what they replace it with. I am opposed to MP Rob Clarke’s bill to repeal the Indian Act tomorrow. It is far more complex than people with a little bit of knowledge about the Indian Act understand.  

 

 

The Harper government isn’t even hiding the fact that it wants to integrate, which means assimilate, First Nations. He wants to unlock our land, which means take the rest of our reserve land and make us like Canadians. That was in their Crown-First Nations gathering speech and is in their policies.

 

 

People need to understand the history, the causes of current conditions, what all the facts are, and the implications of all of these policies.

 

 

The Harper government has no respect for the law, the constitution, the charter, treaties or international law with respect to the duty and legal obligation to solve and accommodate the rights of Indigenous peoples, and that’s clear. I support any Indigenous nation that wants to protect its territory, but it’s not my call to make. 

 

 

Stephen Harper and Conservative governments generally silence any voices that make the current realities of Indigenous people public knowledge, their culpability public knowledge, and Indigenous resistance  – what it is that they’re doing – public knowledge. So Sisters in Spirit brought to light that Indigenous women were going murdered and missing, and that the police didn’t give any care or thought to that, because they consider these women subhuman. Because Sisters in Spirit brought this to light, they had their funding cut. 

 

This past summer, the Assembly of  Manitoba Chiefs decided to take on the cause of murdered and missing aboriginal women, and they had their funding cut by 80 percent. This is how Harper will silence our voices, aside from omnibus bills and legislation, and the labelling of environmentalists and Indigenous people as terrorists in order to restrict and monitor their movements.

 

 

We must recognize Aboriginal rights and Aboriginal treaty rights, and First Nations’ jurisdiction over their own communities. Adequate and non-discriminatory funding must be provided. 

 

 

I have to make sure that what I am doing is always done from a place of respecting every other Indigenous nation’s solidarity. While I might say, “Well, I don’t represent all Indigenous people” and “I don't represent all Mi’kmaw people,” the public will take it that way. Thus, I always have to be careful that whatever I am saying respects everyone’s sovereignty and their own Indigenous cultures and ways of being. I need to be cautious that I don’t ever come forward to impose solutions or anything else on anyone.

 

 

Solidarity means standing beside and supporting. It doesn’t mean you agree with everything. But it means when you can, stand in support. Never assume the role of saviour, or assume that you know what’s best. Don’t let your own agenda determine how you treat Indigenous people.

 

Solidarity not saviourism.