The Media Co-op

Local Independent News

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

Federal Lake Winnipeg cash not going toward clean-up

Critics claim federal money is being misspent, more resources needed

by Alex Paterson

The federal government’s announcement of $17.7 million to clean up the polluted Lake Winnipeg has come under fire from critics who claim the Harper Conservatives are misspending the money.

On Aug. 2, the federal government announced a continuation of funding - $17.7 million over four years - for clean-up efforts on Lake Winnipeg following the $17 million they previously allocated through Environment Canada and the department of Fisheries and Oceans.

This continuation of the initiative will allocate $12.1 million to scientific research, $3.7 million to community stewardship programs, and $1.9 million to water governance.

“For every dollar Ottawa spends, the province and other partners in the cleanup pitch in $2,” said Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the time of the announcement.

The federal government reinvested the money to protect fisheries and the lake for recreational use as part of the second phase of a broader clean-up initiative that began in 2006.

Despite the large sums of money at play, environmental experts remain unconvinced the money will dramatically improve the condition of Lake Winnipeg, which is marred by algal blooms and other pollution-related ailments.

Experts argue the money is largely going toward paying the salaries of federal employees at Environment Canada and the department of Fisheries and Oceans rather than being invested in tangible projects that reduce phosphorous dumping in Lake Winnipeg.

Vicki Burns, outreach coordinator for the Lake Winnipeg Foundation, argues only a small portion of the federal money will be going to lake research.

“Much like the last phase where only $3.5 million went to projects once staff overhead is accounted for there is very little money for research and projects,” she said, adding that an investment of $50 million, over five years, dedicated directly to wetland protection and restoration would match the scale of the problem.

“This ($50 million) is less than the public is paying for the new Bomber stadium and equal to what Manitobans invested into the new polar Bear exhibit at the zoo.”

Adam Sweet, a spokesperson for Environment Canada, stated that the salary numbers were not yet available and he was unable to comment on how the federal investment is being allocated.

According to numbers released by Mark Johnson Spokesperson for Environment Canada during phase 1 of the project roughly 2.5 million dollars went to community projects with some including wetland restoration.

Richard Grossman, an employee with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, argues that healthy wetlands are essential for removing nutrients and that investing in wetlands would make a significant contribution to the overall health of Lake Winnipeg.

In particular, Grossman has been studying the economic and environmental benefits of harvested cattails - the tall, reedy marsh plants seen throughout Manitoba - through the Netley-Libau Nutrient Bio-Energy Project.

“Harvested cattails remove 20-60 kilograms of phosphorus per hectare,” he said, adding the federal and provincial governments should collaborate on a strategy to encourage farmers and landowners to maintain their wetlands.

For this to happen, governments need to develop new policies and economic incentives, including the idea of payments for ecological services or tax credits, he said.

Burns and Grossman both agree that wetlands reconstruction is essential to revitalizing the health of Lake Winnipeg.

Additionally, wetland investments could help with flood prevention, according to Burns.

A provincial spokesperson from Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship agreed.

“Any water held or delayed in a wetland is water not entering the overall system, and any effort to retain water on the landscape is beneficial overall. Wetlands are an important tool to help mitigate and reduce the impact of small- to medium-sized floods,” the department said in an email.

The Federal Government has paid out at least 120 million dollars on flood relief in the last 3 years for floods between the years 2009-2012, according to numbers provided by Public Safety Canada Spokesperson Jean Paul Duval.

On top of that money, 332.5 million dollars was dedicated to expanding the Red River Floodway, according to the Floodway Authority’s 2010 annual report.

Since 2003 there has been around 500 million spent on floods while relatively little was dedicated to projects actually preventing water from getting into the watersheds to cause a flood in the first place.

Representatives from Environment Canada and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans were unavailable for further comment on the announcement of the federal investment or alternative proposals by press time.

(A shorter version of the article was originally published in The Uniter  )

Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.
Topics: Environment
716 words